Methodology

Five phases, with the same engineers from kickoff to handoff.

Below is the full version, which is our AI Enablement Sprint. Rapid AI Development skips Sprint Zero and goes straight to architecture and code. Fractional engagements run the same discipline at a steady pace.

The AI Enablement Sprint

12 weeks

123456789101112

Rapid AI Development skips Sprint Zero and goes straight to architecture and code.

Fractional AI Team runs the same discipline at a steady pace.

The engagement

Roughly one quarter from kickoff to handoff

Pick a phase to see what happens, week by week, and what you have at the end of it.

Phase 1 · Week 1–2

Sprint Zero

We interview stakeholders, map your processes and data flows, and decide where the PII boundaries sit. Then every candidate use case goes through the AI Necessity Gate, which asks three questions.

Test 1

The Simplicity Test

Does a deterministic pipeline do this?

Test 2

The Clarity Test

Is the outcome measurable in value, not hours?

Test 3

The Data Test

Is the data governed enough to trust the output?

The team

Who you'll actually work with

Every engagement is staffed by a small group of senior people, and you'll work with the same people from kickoff to handoff.

Engagement Lead

Strategy & delivery

Aligns with your leadership on roadmap, ROI, and decision cadence. Owns the executive relationship and the SOW.

Where they spend their timeWeekly leadership syncs, scope adjustments, value validation.

Principal Architect

Systems & Data Architect

Designs the system architecture: data flows, model routing, security boundaries, RAG pipelines, vector DBs, data contracts and metadata.

Where they spend their timeArchitecture sessions with your engineering and security teams.

Senior AI Engineer

Agents & orchestration

Hands-on engineer. Builds the agents, configures orchestration (LangGraph, LangChain, MCP), implements human-in-the-loop workflows.

Where they spend their timeIn your codebase, in production logs, in the weekly demos.

Adoption Lead

Training & change

Builds a group of internal champions, designs training for each role, manages internal comms so the system actually gets adopted.

Where they spend their timeWith your product owners, in training sessions, in runbook authoring.

Senior Data Engineers

Pipelines & evaluation

Build the semantic layer, embeddings, ingestion pipelines, APIs, MCP integrations, and the evaluation frameworks that keep the system honest.

Where they spend their timeIn your data warehouse, building APIs, on integration testing.

Our leads pair directly with your security, platform, internal engineering, and privacy organizations. We work alongside your team rather than around it.

Cross-cutting

Security is part of every phase

We don't run security as a separate workstream. Here's where each piece gets done.

Sub-processor disclosurePhase 0
Data classification & flow mappingPhase 1
PII boundaries & tokenization designPhase 1
Access controls & role mappingPhase 2
Model logging, prompt logging, audit trailPhase 2–3
Human review policyPhase 3
Change control & deployment gatesPhase 3–4
Incident runbook & post-engagement playbookPhase 4

FusionLeap engineers to your compliance team's spec. We do not provide legal, regulatory, or audit opinions, and we do not act as your DPO, counsel, or auditor of record.

Secure-by-design

How we secure AI-assisted development

The AI coding tools we use bring their own risks: leaked IP, exposed secrets, and insecure code. Before any code gets written, we lock down the development environment in four layers.

01

Configuration

Every AI coding assistant runs on enterprise settings: no training on your code, sensitive files excluded, telemetry locked down.

02

Code Security

Secret scanning, SAST tools such as Snyk and SonarQube, and pre-commit hooks such as Gitleaks catch credentials and insecure patterns before anything is merged.

03

Network

For clinical records, pet-owner PII, and payments, AI traffic goes through private endpoints such as Azure OpenAI, AWS Bedrock with VPC isolation, or your own model gateway.

04

Culture & Governance

Your engineers learn to review AI-written code more closely than human-written code, so a person still makes the final call.

Where AI coding tools help, and where they don't

Green zone

High AI autonomy

Unit tests · Documentation · Boilerplate · New microservices

Yellow zone

Human pairing required

Legacy refactoring · API integration · SQL optimization

Red zone

Human-led

Proprietary internal libraries · System-wide architecture · God classes

AI models learn mostly from modern public code, so on a decade-old monolith or a proprietary SDK they write code that looks right but breaks rules nobody wrote down. Architecture decisions and cross-service dependencies still need a person.

Who does what

FusionLeap vs. your team

Procurement always asks: "What does my team have to do?" and "How many hours per week?" Here's what to expect.

Phase 0: Pre-engagement

FusionLeap

Mutual NDA, security questionnaire response, MSA/SOW drafting, kickoff agenda, sub-processor disclosure

Your team

Sponsor + security/legal reviewers identified, stakeholders mapped, system access scoped

Phase 1: Sprint Zero

FusionLeap

Stakeholder interviews, process and data-flow mapping, PII boundary design, AI Necessity Gate, build plan

Your team

Make 8–15 stakeholders available (1 hr each), provide read-only data access, share strategic context

Phase 2: Rapid prototyping

FusionLeap

Architecture, environment setup, model selection, build, weekly demos, cost analysis

Your team

Decision-maker at weekly demo (1 hr/wk), data SME available (3–5 hrs/wk), feedback within 2 business days

Phase 3: Production hardening

FusionLeap

Error handling, observability, audit trails, cost ceilings, integration tests, security validation memo, executive demo

Your team

Test data sign-off, executive sponsor at hand-off demo, security team available for review

Phase 4: Enablement

FusionLeap

Runbook, model selection criteria, fallback policies, cost ceilings, training sessions, on-call shadowing

Your team

Engineering team participates in training, product owner identified for the ongoing system

Post-engagement

FusionLeap

Check-ins 4 weeks after handoff and at the end of the first quarter. Optional Fractional AI Team engagement

Your team

System ownership, on-call coverage, regular quarterly reviews

Senior client time per week

Hours, across the 12-week engagement. Hover a week for detail.

0
5
10
6–10 hrs/wk3–5 hrs/wk
W1W2W3W4W5W6W7W8W9W10W11W12
Show as table
WeeksSenior client time
1–46–10 hours/week
5–123–5 hours/week

Senior client time

A few hours a week

More in the first four weeks, less after that

Concentrated in three roles

  • Executive sponsor for governance2–4 hrs/wk
  • Data SME for build feedback3–5 hrs/wk
  • Engineering team during Phase 4 handoff5–8 hrs/wk

Principles

What stays the same on every engagement

Senior people only.

We don't staff juniors on client work.

Your data, from week three.

We work with your real data rather than sanitized samples, tokenized where it's sensitive and kept inside your perimeter.

Security from the start.

PII boundaries, model logging, audit trails, and review policies are designed up front, before the build starts, so they don't surface late in review.

We'll tell you when AI is the wrong tool.

If a deterministic script does the job better than an LLM, we build the script. We recommend against AI about as often as we recommend it.

You own it.

Everything runs in your cloud, on your keys, in your repos. You aren't locked in to us or to a model provider.

We plan to leave.

Runbooks, shadowing, and pairing mean your team can run the system on its own after week twelve.

Ready to run an engagement like this?

In a 30-minute call we'll help you work out which engagement fits and what the first 90 days would look like.

Talk to an Architect