Proof

What we've shipped.

Everything below was built for and used by real clients. We keep client names private under NDA, so quotes are attributed by job title.

Veterinarian in scrubs updating visit notes on a tablet while a vet nurse holds a golden retriever on the exam table
Animal Health & Pharmacy · USA

Getting an ungoverned data estate in order and putting production AI on top of it, in one quarter

Animal Health & Pharmacy Platform

A national animal-health e-commerce and pharmacy platform with plenty of data, but very little context around it.

900+ / month

Clinical summaries

Written inside the practice-management system vets already use

50–60%

Less documentation time per visit

Cents

Cost per summary

After comparing four models for clinical accuracy

The situation

  • Practice-management data arrived a day late, and integrations moved records without saying what had happened or why.
  • Kafka was being used to store state, not to carry events, so nothing downstream could rely on it.
  • Pet-owner PII and payment data moved through pipelines in clear text, with no data contracts and no tokenization.
  • Four different ingestion methods, and no single place to see what was flowing where.
Clinical documentation generator interface showing patient search, template selection, and visit notes input

What we built, with their engineers in the code

  1. 1

    Governed event spine

    One reliable stream of events, with contracts every producer and consumer has to follow: Confluent Kafka, Schema Registry, Avro, and a reference pipeline into Snowflake.

  2. 2

    Tokenization at the source

    Pet-owner PII, veterinarian identifiers, and clinical fields become tokens before they leave the source system, using Google Cloud DLP with per-field methods and keys in Cloud KMS.

  3. 3

    AI-enhanced SDLC

    A delivery process built for AI-assisted coding: machine-readable specs, generated tests and docs, and pre-commit guardrails. The client's engineers used it to build the second data product themselves.

  4. 4

    Two data products

    A record-matching service (ours) and a recommendations writeback (theirs, built with that same process).

  5. 5

    The use case on top

    Vets get each visit summary drafted for them, inside the system they already use. Built in ten weeks: four models evaluated for clinical accuracy, with role-based access and audit logging, on a foundation the security team had already approved.

What the client owns now

The event spine, the tokenization service, the delivery tooling and guardrails, and both data products. Just as important, their engineers built enough of it to keep extending it, one domain at a time, without us.

Stack

Confluent KafkaSchema RegistryAvroSnowflakeGoogle Cloud DLPCloud KMS
“We'd been burned before by consultants who delivered beautiful presentations but no working code. FusionLeap was different.”
CTO, Animal Health Platform
Operations clerk at a warehouse receiving desk sorting a stack of purchase orders and invoices beside a document scanner
Supply Chain · USA

Document processing without templates, saving $4M a year at 99.5% accuracy

Supply Chain Operator

$4M / year

Saved every year

And still holding, year over year

99.5%

Document accuracy at production volume

70% fewer errors than the old OCR system

8,000 / day

Documents, 30 seconds or less each

55–60% go through with no human touch; customer escalations down 90%

The challenge

  • Purchase orders and invoices arrived in many different layouts. The OCR system needed a template for each one, so anything new landed on someone's desk.
  • Misread documents caused billing errors, and billing errors caused customer escalations.
  • Every exception carried regulatory paperwork, which made each manual fix slow and expensive.
  • The business could only grow as fast as the operations team could key in documents.

What we did

  1. 1

    Mapped the documents

    We catalogued the purchase order and invoice types customers actually send, where the data goes afterwards, and which regulatory rules apply to each.

  2. 2

    Dropped the templates

    We replaced template-per-layout OCR with models that read a document the way a person does, so a new layout doesn't need new setup.

  3. 3

    Built in the checks

    Every extracted field gets a confidence score. Anything below the threshold goes to a person, every document gets an audit record, and reviewer corrections are fed back in so the same mistake gets rarer.

  4. 4

    Proved it at volume

    We connected it to their existing compliance and audit systems, showed it holding 99.5% accuracy at 8,000+ documents a day, and set the review thresholds from real reviewer feedback.

  5. 5

    Handed it over

    We trained the operations team to monitor the system, handle exceptions, and adjust the routing rules, and left them a rollback plan.

Stack

Multi-OCR ensembleDatabricksChromaLangflowPythonIntern-VL

Engagement reference and detailed metrics available under NDA.

Sales engineer on a headset matching a thread cone against a fabric swatch, with shelves of colored thread and color cards in a thread manufacturer's sample room
Industrial Manufacturing · UK

Open-text search that made quoting 40% faster

Industrial Manufacturer

40% faster

Quote turnaround

Customers get a quote sooner

2× capacity

Twice the requests, same team

Search results 15–20% more precise and 25–35% faster

20–30% ↓

Lower pre-sales support cost

The same volume of requests for less

The challenge

  • Customers describe thread in their own words: a color, a weight, a material, what it's for. Matching that to the right product in the catalog was done by hand.
  • Every quote meant someone searching a database of thousands of SKUs, so quotes were slow.
  • The existing search only worked if you already knew the exact thread code or specification.
  • The only way to handle more requests was to hire more support staff.

What we did

  1. 1

    Learned how customers ask

    We studied the catalog, the sales process, and the words customers actually use: color names, end uses, and vague descriptions.

  2. 2

    Turned plain English into a search

    We built a system that reads a customer's request and turns it into a precise database query, with the color and material matching rules built in.

  3. 3

    Built the screens

    We built search and quoting screens for customers and for the internal sales team.

  4. 4

    Tuned it and shipped it

    We tuned the ranking against past sales, checked precision on real customer requests, and launched it with a feedback loop so results keep improving.

Stack

AWS LambdaCloudWatchDatabricksChromaCrewAI orchestrationOpenAI models

Engagement reference and detailed metrics available under NDA.

Merchandise planner in a retail stockroom checking a printed allocation sheet against inventory on a laptop, with the store floor through the doorway
Retail & Logistics · Global

Seven forecasting models compete each cycle, and store-level forecasts arrive in under a minute

A forecasting service for a global retail and logistics enterprise

Each cycle, four tree-based models (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, RandomForest) and three neural models (N-BEATS, DeepAR, TFT) are evaluated against each other, and the best one is picked automatically. The demand curve, receipts, and allocation for every store and SKU come back in under a minute. Tuning runs on Optuna, MLflow manages the model lifecycle, and the data sits in BigQuery.

Worth noting: there's no LLM anywhere in this system. Classical forecasting models were the right tool for the job.

The model tournament, every cycle

Tree-based

XGBoostLightGBMCatBoostRandomForest

Neural

N-BEATSDeepARTFT

Champion picked automatically

Demand curve, receipts, and store-SKU allocation in under a minute

Business leaders talking around breakout tables at a quarterly review while a facilitator stands at one table holding a tablet
Animal Health & Pharmacy · USA

An AI agent that facilitated a QBR across breakout rooms

Animal Health & Pharmacy Platform

3 rooms, 1 plan

Ready before the session ended

18 documents

Summaries checked against the client's own material

The challenge

  • The client ran its quarterly business review in several breakout rooms at once.
  • They wanted each room's discussion captured and summarized while it happened.
  • They wanted one plan for the whole group by the end of the session, not a week later.

What we built

  1. 1

    Listens and transcribes

    The agent listens to each breakout room live and transcribes the discussion.

  2. 2

    Summarizes each room

    When a room pauses, it pulls out the key themes and summarizes them, checked against the client's own documents.

  3. 3

    Answers facilitators

    Facilitators can ask it how a room is going, by voice or by typing.

  4. 4

    Builds one plan

    Before the session ends, it combines every room into a single set of headlines and recommendations. A facilitator reviews and edits everything before it's shared.

Stack

Vertex AIGoogle speech-to-text

Engagement reference available under NDA.

We operate what we sell

Products we built and still run

WysLeap and PulsairSocial carry real traffic every day. FusionTest is in public beta.

WysLeap Logo

WysLeap

Privacy-first visitor analytics platform

10M+ events/monthSub-100ms99.9% uptime
  • Processing 10M+ events per monthEvent ingestion and storage engineered for sustained volume
  • Sub-100ms response timesAnalytics queries fast enough for real-time use

What this proves

We run production data systems ourselves, so we deal with the same cost, latency, and on-call trade-offs our clients do.

PulsairSocial Logo

PulsairSocial

Multi-channel social listening platform

7 platformsText + imageReal-time
  • Multi-channel ingestion across 7 platformsX (Twitter), TikTok, Pinterest, YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, and LinkedIn
  • Text and image stream analysisUnstructured multi-modal data turned into structured signal

What this proves

It runs on messy, unstructured data from many sources, which is exactly where most enterprise AI programs get stuck.

FusionTest homepage: Your coding agent checked it once. FusionTest checks it on every deploy.
FusionTest Logo

FusionTest

Regression testing that remembers every deploy

Public betaPlain-English testsNo source access
  • Replays recorded tests without AI callsMeasured on fusionleap.io: 134 s and 25.9k tokens the first time, 14 s and no tokens on replay
  • A separate verifier decides pass or failA failure is only reported once it happens again in a fresh session, with a screenshot

What this proves

We run AI agents in production with a separate check on their work, and we only call the model when it's needed. It's the same pattern we build for clients.

Visit FusionTest

Have something similar in mind?

Tell us what you're working on, and we'll tell you what it would take to get it into production.

Talk to an Architect